daniel/deepdrft
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases 13 Wiki Activity

docs: mark ModelView DI briefs resolved (shipped in BlazorBlocks 10.3.33 / AuthBlocks 10.3.36)

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
daniel-c-harvey
2026-06-19 23:58:14 -04:00
parent 9300c794b4
commit a2ed334d0d
3 changed files with 12 additions and 7 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
product-notes/blazorblocks-modelview-di-registration-brief.md
+4 -2
View File
@@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
# Index — `EditModalSaveContextHolder` Missing DI Registration (BlazorBlocks / AuthBlocks)
**Status:** scoped, not yet started. Confirmed against `Cerebellum.BlazorBlocks.Web` 10.3.32 /
`Cerebellum.AuthBlocks.Web` 10.3.33. Author: product-designer. Date: 2026-06-19.
**Status:** ✅ RESOLVED — shipped in `Cerebellum.BlazorBlocks.Web` 10.3.33 + `Cerebellum.AuthBlocks.Web` 10.3.36 (2026-06-20). ~~scoped, not yet started. Confirmed against `Cerebellum.BlazorBlocks.Web` 10.3.32 / `Cerebellum.AuthBlocks.Web` 10.3.33. Author: product-designer. Date: 2026-06-19.~~
> **Resolution (2026-06-20):** `AddBlazorBlocksWeb()` landed in `Cerebellum.BlazorBlocks.Web` 10.3.33 and `ConfigureAuthServices` calls it in `Cerebellum.AuthBlocks.Web` 10.3.36; DeepDrftManager picked up 10.3.36 and removed its local `EditModalSaveContextHolder` stopgap.
> This brief is retained as historical record — no further action required.
## The defect
product-notes/team-brief-authblocks-modelview-di.md
+4 -3
View File
@@ -5,9 +5,10 @@
consume AuthBlocks. Everything you need is in this brief or in that one repo (plus a single new BlazorBlocks
package version — see §2, the blocking prerequisite).
**Status:** scoped request, blocked on a BlazorBlocks publish (see §2). Confirmed at runtime against
`Cerebellum.AuthBlocks.Web` 10.3.33 / `Cerebellum.BlazorBlocks.Web` 10.3.32. Author: product-designer (for a
downstream consumer team). Date: 2026-06-19.
**Status:** ✅ RESOLVED — shipped in `Cerebellum.BlazorBlocks.Web` 10.3.33 + `Cerebellum.AuthBlocks.Web` 10.3.36 (2026-06-20). ~~scoped request, blocked on a BlazorBlocks publish (see §2). Confirmed at runtime against `Cerebellum.AuthBlocks.Web` 10.3.33 / `Cerebellum.BlazorBlocks.Web` 10.3.32. Author: product-designer (for a downstream consumer team). Date: 2026-06-19.~~
> **Resolution (2026-06-20):** `AddBlazorBlocksWeb()` landed in `Cerebellum.BlazorBlocks.Web` 10.3.33 and `ConfigureAuthServices` calls it in `Cerebellum.AuthBlocks.Web` 10.3.36; DeepDrftManager picked up 10.3.36 and removed its local `EditModalSaveContextHolder` stopgap.
> This brief is retained as historical record — no further action required.
**This is one half of a two-team, ordered fix. AuthBlocks ships second — see §2 and §9.**
product-notes/team-brief-blazorblocks-modelview-di.md
+4 -2
View File
@@ -4,8 +4,10 @@
`C:\Development\BlazorBlocks`. You do not need, and should not assume, any knowledge of AuthBlocks or of
any product that consumes BlazorBlocks. Everything you need is in this brief or in that one repo.
**Status:** scoped request, not yet started. Confirmed at runtime against `Cerebellum.BlazorBlocks.Web`
10.3.32. Author: product-designer (for a downstream consumer team). Date: 2026-06-19.
**Status:** ✅ RESOLVED — shipped in `Cerebellum.BlazorBlocks.Web` 10.3.33 + `Cerebellum.AuthBlocks.Web` 10.3.36 (2026-06-20). ~~scoped request, not yet started. Confirmed at runtime against `Cerebellum.BlazorBlocks.Web` 10.3.32. Author: product-designer (for a downstream consumer team). Date: 2026-06-19.~~
> **Resolution (2026-06-20):** `AddBlazorBlocksWeb()` landed in `Cerebellum.BlazorBlocks.Web` 10.3.33 and `ConfigureAuthServices` calls it in `Cerebellum.AuthBlocks.Web` 10.3.36; DeepDrftManager picked up 10.3.36 and removed its local `EditModalSaveContextHolder` stopgap.
> This brief is retained as historical record — no further action required.
**This is one half of a two-team, ordered fix. BlazorBlocks ships first — see §9.**