daniel
7cd0771e45
Top-bar rare-capture variants move to a right-anchored More popup; short faces gain hover-delay full-name tooltips (prefix stripped); bottom bar becomes four opposite-mode Item/Track tag buttons + Show Both (Toggle/Activates dropped); wider cluster gaps. New pure overflow_menu/mode_enable/tooltip modules, CTest-covered. Same actions, same contract.
65 lines
3.0 KiB
C++
65 lines
3.0 KiB
C++
// Standalone tests for reasampler::mode_enable — no REAPER, no test framework. Asserts the
|
|
// opposite-mode tag-button enablement predicate for BOTH active modes (the acceptance criterion:
|
|
// covered for both, not only whichever a DAW pass sat in).
|
|
//
|
|
// The rule (L5 refinement 3): a tag button whose target is `t` is LIVE iff `t` != the active
|
|
// mode — you tag INTO the mode you are not currently in. When Design is active, "…: Arrange"
|
|
// buttons are live and "…: Design" buttons are dead; when Arrange is active, the reverse. An
|
|
// unrecognized active id fails OPEN (every button live) so a future mode never dead-locks the bar.
|
|
|
|
#include "../src/mode_enable.h"
|
|
#include "../src/view_mode_model.h" // kArrangeModeId / kDesignModeId — the ids the rule keys off
|
|
|
|
#include <cstdio>
|
|
#include <string>
|
|
|
|
using namespace reasampler;
|
|
|
|
static int g_fail = 0;
|
|
#define CHECK(cond) do { if(!(cond)) { \
|
|
std::printf("FAIL line %d: %s\n", __LINE__, #cond); ++g_fail; } } while(0)
|
|
|
|
// When ARRANGE is active: only the Design-target buttons are live (tag into Design); the
|
|
// Arrange-target buttons are dead (already in Arrange — nothing to do).
|
|
static void testArrangeActive() {
|
|
const std::string active = kArrangeModeId;
|
|
CHECK(!tagButtonEnabled(active, TagTarget::Arrange)); // dead — already active mode
|
|
CHECK(tagButtonEnabled(active, TagTarget::Design)); // live — opposite mode
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// When DESIGN is active: the reverse — only the Arrange-target buttons are live.
|
|
static void testDesignActive() {
|
|
const std::string active = kDesignModeId;
|
|
CHECK(tagButtonEnabled(active, TagTarget::Arrange)); // live — opposite mode
|
|
CHECK(!tagButtonEnabled(active, TagTarget::Design)); // dead — already active mode
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Exactly one of the two targets is live in each mode (the buttons are complementary — a real
|
|
// pair, never both-live or both-dead). This is the invariant the disabled/enabled visuals rely on.
|
|
static void testExactlyOneTargetLivePerMode() {
|
|
CHECK(tagButtonEnabled(kArrangeModeId, TagTarget::Arrange) !=
|
|
tagButtonEnabled(kArrangeModeId, TagTarget::Design));
|
|
CHECK(tagButtonEnabled(kDesignModeId, TagTarget::Arrange) !=
|
|
tagButtonEnabled(kDesignModeId, TagTarget::Design));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// An unrecognized active id (neither seed mode — e.g. empty when no session, or a future mode)
|
|
// fails OPEN: every button live, so the user can always reach the action.
|
|
static void testUnknownActiveFailsOpen() {
|
|
CHECK(tagButtonEnabled("", TagTarget::Arrange));
|
|
CHECK(tagButtonEnabled("", TagTarget::Design));
|
|
CHECK(tagButtonEnabled("some-future-mode", TagTarget::Arrange));
|
|
CHECK(tagButtonEnabled("some-future-mode", TagTarget::Design));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int main() {
|
|
testArrangeActive();
|
|
testDesignActive();
|
|
testExactlyOneTargetLivePerMode();
|
|
testUnknownActiveFailsOpen();
|
|
|
|
if (g_fail == 0) std::printf("mode_enable: all tests passed\n");
|
|
else std::printf("mode_enable: %d CHECK(s) FAILED\n", g_fail);
|
|
return g_fail == 0 ? 0 : 1;
|
|
}
|