reasampler/tests/test_guid_diff.cpp

// Standalone tests for reasampler::newGuids + GuidBaseline — no REAPER, no test
// framework. Mirror of test_view_mode_model: iterate the hard logic outside the DAW.
//
// Covers (D2 Wave-2 new-content detection):
//  1. newGuids: current \ previous, empty-GUID filtering, determinism.
//  2. GuidBaseline first-poll guard: the first observe() after open reports NOTHING
//     new (pre-existing content stays Arrange) and establishes the baseline.
//  3. Incremental detection: only GUIDs added since the prior observe() are returned.
//  4. Deletion drops from the baseline so a reused GUID is re-detected.
//  5. reset() (project switch) re-arms the first-poll guard: the next observe()
//     re-baselines and reports nothing new — never diffs across projects.

#include "../src/core/view/guid_diff.h"

#include <cstdio>
#include <set>
#include <string>
#include <vector>

using namespace reasampler;
using namespace reasampler::view;

static int g_fail = 0;
#define CHECK(cond) do { if(!(cond)) { \
    std::printf("FAIL line %d: %s\n", __LINE__, #cond); ++g_fail; } } while(0)

static bool has(const std::vector<std::string>& v, const std::string& g) {
    for (const auto& e : v) if (e == g) return true;
    return false;
}

// -- 1. newGuids set difference ----------------------------------------------

static void testNewGuidsDifference() {
    std::set<std::string> prev{"{A}", "{B}"};
    std::set<std::string> cur{"{A}", "{B}", "{C}", "{D}"};

    auto added = newGuids(prev, cur);
    CHECK(added.size() == 2);
    CHECK(has(added, "{C}"));
    CHECK(has(added, "{D}"));
    CHECK(!has(added, "{A}"));      // pre-existing, not new
    CHECK(!has(added, "{B}"));

    // No change ⇒ nothing new.
    CHECK(newGuids(cur, cur).empty());

    // A removed GUID is not "new" (it is absent from current).
    std::set<std::string> shrunk{"{A}"};
    CHECK(newGuids(prev, shrunk).empty());

    // Determinism: ascending set order.
    std::set<std::string> p2;
    std::set<std::string> c2{"{Z}", "{A}", "{M}"};
    auto ordered = newGuids(p2, c2);
    CHECK(ordered.size() == 3);
    CHECK(ordered[0] == "{A}" && ordered[1] == "{M}" && ordered[2] == "{Z}");
}

static void testNewGuidsIgnoresEmpty() {
    std::set<std::string> prev{"{A}"};
    std::set<std::string> cur{"", "{A}", "{B}"};   // empty ⇒ a GUID-read failure
    auto added = newGuids(prev, cur);
    CHECK(added.size() == 1);
    CHECK(has(added, "{B}"));
    CHECK(!has(added, ""));          // never tag an empty GUID
}

// -- 2. First-poll guard -----------------------------------------------------

static void testBaselineFirstPollReportsNothing() {
    GuidBaseline b;
    CHECK(!b.primed());
    // First observe after open: pre-existing content must NOT be tagged.
    auto first = b.observe({"{A}", "{B}", "{C}"});
    CHECK(first.empty());            // nothing new at open
    CHECK(b.primed());
}

// -- 3. Incremental detection ------------------------------------------------

static void testBaselineIncremental() {
    GuidBaseline b;
    b.observe({"{A}", "{B}"});                 // baseline
    auto t1 = b.observe({"{A}", "{B}", "{C}"});
    CHECK(t1.size() == 1 && has(t1, "{C}"));   // only the newly-added GUID

    // Next tick with a further addition — earlier-added {C} is now baseline.
    auto t2 = b.observe({"{A}", "{B}", "{C}", "{D}"});
    CHECK(t2.size() == 1 && has(t2, "{D}"));
    CHECK(!has(t2, "{C}"));

    // A steady state reports nothing new.
    CHECK(b.observe({"{A}", "{B}", "{C}", "{D}"}).empty());
}

// -- 4. Deletion drops from baseline; reused GUID re-detected ----------------

static void testBaselineDeletionReDetect() {
    GuidBaseline b;
    b.observe({"{A}", "{B}"});
    // Delete {B}: not "new", and drops out of the baseline.
    CHECK(b.observe({"{A}"}).empty());
    // {B} reappears (REAPER reused the GUID or the user re-added) ⇒ detected again.
    auto again = b.observe({"{A}", "{B}"});
    CHECK(again.size() == 1 && has(again, "{B}"));
}

// -- 5. reset() re-arms the first-poll guard (project switch) -----------------

static void testResetReBaselines() {
    GuidBaseline b;
    b.observe({"{A}"});                        // project 1 baseline
    b.observe({"{A}", "{B}"});                 // {B} detected in project 1

    b.reset();
    CHECK(!b.primed());
    // Switching to project 2: its pre-existing content must NOT be mass-tagged even
    // though those GUIDs were never seen before reset.
    auto afterSwitch = b.observe({"{X}", "{Y}", "{Z}"});
    CHECK(afterSwitch.empty());                // re-baselined, nothing new
    CHECK(b.primed());
    // Content created in project 2 after the switch IS detected.
    auto p2new = b.observe({"{X}", "{Y}", "{Z}", "{W}"});
    CHECK(p2new.size() == 1 && has(p2new, "{W}"));
}

// -- 6. Reload-mis-tag regression: a project LOAD must re-baseline before the first
//       post-load observe, so the newly-loaded project's PRE-EXISTING content is never
//       reported as new. This locks the exact failure behind the reload-mis-tag bug:
//       the detector used to re-arm on a `proj != lastProject` pointer compare, which a
//       recycled ReaProject* address defeats; the previous project's stale baseline then
//       reported the whole just-loaded project as new content and it got mass-tagged into
//       the active mode. The fix routes the re-arm through persist's authoritative load
//       signal (bankPanelNotifyProjectLoaded -> reset()), modeled here as: on a load,
//       reset() runs BEFORE the first observe of the new project's set.
//
//       The seam under test is GuidBaseline; the shell wiring (main.cpp notify ->
//       bank_panel reset()) is DAW-verified, but the load-then-observe DECISION lives
//       here and is what the bug got wrong.
static void testReloadReBaselinesBeforeFirstObserve() {
    // Project A is open and settled: its content is the baseline, steady state reports
    // nothing new. This is the "extension already running against project A" precondition
    // the bug needs (a NON-empty stale baseline to mis-diff the next project against).
    GuidBaseline b;
    b.observe({"{A1}", "{A2}"});                 // A baseline (first-poll guard)
    CHECK(b.observe({"{A1}", "{A2}"}).empty());  // steady: nothing new
    CHECK(b.primed());

    // Daniel opens project B (saved in Design). B's pre-existing tracks are an ENTIRELY
    // different GUID set from A. persist raises its load signal; the fix calls reset()
    // (via bankPanelNotifyProjectLoaded) BEFORE the first post-load observe.
    b.reset();
    auto afterLoad = b.observe({"{B1}", "{B2}", "{B3}"});
    // The load must tag NOTHING: B's pre-existing content is the baseline, not "new".
    // Untagged/Arrange leaves stay Arrange; nothing is mass-tagged into Design.
    CHECK(afterLoad.empty());

    // And genuine post-load creation in B is still detected (the fix must not deafen the
    // detector — only suppress the pre-existing set at the load boundary).
    auto createdInB = b.observe({"{B1}", "{B2}", "{B3}", "{B4}"});
    CHECK(createdInB.size() == 1 && has(createdInB, "{B4}"));
}

// -- 6b. Negative control: WITHOUT the load re-baseline (the old pointer-miss path where
//        reset() never fired), the just-loaded project's pre-existing content IS reported
//        as new — i.e. it would be mass-tagged. This proves the assertion in test 6 is
//        load-bearing (the reset() is what prevents the mis-tag), not self-affirming.
static void testMissingReBaselineWouldMisTag() {
    GuidBaseline b;
    b.observe({"{A1}", "{A2}"});                 // A baseline
    b.observe({"{A1}", "{A2}"});                 // settled against A

    // Simulate the BUG: no reset() on the load (the pointer compare missed a recycled
    // ReaProject*). The next observe diffs B's set against A's stale baseline.
    auto misdetected = b.observe({"{B1}", "{B2}", "{B3}"});
    // Every one of B's pre-existing tracks looks "new" — exactly the mass-tag that
    // parked the Arrange tracks into Design on open. This is the failure the fix removes.
    CHECK(misdetected.size() == 3);
    CHECK(has(misdetected, "{B1}") && has(misdetected, "{B2}") && has(misdetected, "{B3}"));
}

int main() {
    testNewGuidsDifference();
    testNewGuidsIgnoresEmpty();
    testBaselineFirstPollReportsNothing();
    testBaselineIncremental();
    testBaselineDeletionReDetect();
    testResetReBaselines();
    testReloadReBaselinesBeforeFirstObserve();
    testMissingReBaselineWouldMisTag();

    if (g_fail == 0) std::printf("All tests passed.\n");
    return g_fail ? 1 : 0;
}